I just discovered Geoff Hart’s archive of articles and essays. I’m glad his material is available to read even though it is mostly 10 to 20 years old: although some of the material, particularly concerning computers, is out of date, the bulk of it is still valuable. A lot of the pieces are about technical writing and editing. The essays are thoughtful and cover a wide range of topics, such as “Repairing Bad Author–Editor Relationships,” “Politeness in Editing,” “Part of the Problem?” and “Creating ‘Living’ Policies and Procedures,” and he has humorous pieces too, such as “Son of ‘A Programming Primer’: How to Speak Geek.” I pretty much devoured his archive in a few days, and I think you’ll find it worthwhile too.
Copyediting.com has a new post, “The 3 Essential Elements of Author Queries” (the elements are tone, specificity, and tact). It’s well worth reading. As an editor and author I still have room for improvement. I often edit pieces that are missing important information, but I also sometimes leave out important information myself. For example, I wrote a piece for the company newsletter about women’s history and, after referring to Clara Barton’s local connection, noted that March is also Red Cross month. The corporate communications guy politely pointed out that I never mentioned that March is women’s history month. He suggested a correction, and I give him A’s for tone, specificity, and tact.
In my book The Editor’s Companion, I quoted Liz Dexter’s post on being edited on her LibroEditing blog. Her main points:
- Try to build trust first of all
- Remain kind
- Understand that when the client asks a question, sometimes they just need reassurance that they’re not stupid or rubbish at writing
- Make sure I praise as well as criticise
I noted that I was still working on those things. I still am, though I hope I’ve gotten better. I highly recommend reading her whole post.